Nomor Lisensi Cx One

• Kode Lisensi Cx One

Dragon naturally speaking bahasa indonesia. International PLC Forum. Skip to content. Serial number for CX-ONE V4.31: 1600 0285 8143 5387 1600 0325 7848 5341 BY. 2.pilih dan klik 2 kali pada setup untuk memulai insalasi ( setup biasanya di bagian bawah folder cx one ) 3.Pilih bahasa yang diinginkan kemudian klik ok.

Comments

Kode Lisensi Cx One

• How much bloatware do you get for the $400 savings and can the device run with only 64GB of storage? Also what are OnePlus’ sales volume and customer satisfaction ratings?
• I don't give a rat's rear end about benchmarks. All I care about is how well my devices work. Do they perform the functions properly and quickly? We see these stories comparing iOS devices and Macs with other products all the time, and none of them matter to me. Just because another phone is faster than an iPhone on some benchmark makes no difference to me. All I care about is the user experience. It's the same with a Mac. I don't care if Dell is making laptops that are faster than my MacBook Pro. Windows is the thing that makes me not want to buy the Dell. Regular consumers don't give a crap about benchmarks.
• In a nutshell: throwing a lot more cores and RAM at Android does a reasonable job at hiding the inherent problems in the OS, but is probably a really bad way to do business in the long run.
• The best thing about the OnePlus 6, for most of the people logging-into this website, is that competition is good.
  Every company needs to have some competition to keep on their game. And I'm sure a lot of non-Apple users will buy the OnePlus 6 and be happy with it.
  Luckily for Apple, they have a ecosystem for their devices that making investing outside it daunting. But nothing is forever.
  
• You know what? Only techie bullshit artists care about benchmarks.

• We also tested GFXBench's OpenGL Manhattan Offscreen test at 1080p to avoid resolution differences. Here we can see the iPhone X is a fair bit ahead.
  

  
  

  Something is really wrong with the graphics test.
  In GFXBench 1080p Manhattan 3.1 Offscreen results section, a Snapdragon 845 phone will score ~60 Fps, while the iPhone X only scores ~43 Fps.
  According to the 3DMark results website, a Snapdragon 845 device will score ~5000 in the Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited test, while the iPhone X scores ~3200.
  

• You know what? Only techie bullshit artists care about benchmarks.

  Maybe a more accurate way to say that is ‘Only tech-minded people care about benchmarks’. It’s naive to dismiss benchmarks and is it also naive to dismiss ‘real life’ app-switching tests. Both are synthetic and stretch the limits and therefore do not usually reflect actual real usage scenarios, but they are interesting if not always useful. The only useful tests are ones that show actual time savings for an average user—for instance, being able to switch through 20 apps faster than other phones is nearly useless, but being able to export a video in half the time does translate to real time savings.
• Nice if one wants to save some money, especially now that there's little to no phone subsidies being offered, but in the end it's still Android and I don't trust Android's security. Even if it's safe from hacking, I don't want Google monitoring me and collecting my data.
  Having said that and even though I don't think they're sold in the U.S., I'd love to see a comparison of the OPPO phone to the iPhone.

• Moving onto the AnTuTu benchmark, the OnePlus manages to beat out the iPhone X by almost 30%.
  

  Eh.What? OnePlus has 34.6k, while iPhoneX has 37.5k in AnTuTu, no?

  Am I missing something? 34.6k is not 30% larger than 37.5k. It just isn't!

  edited May 2018

• Moving onto the AnTuTu benchmark, the OnePlus manages to beat out the iPhone X by almost 30%.
  

  Eh.What? OnePlus has 34.6k, while iPhoneX has 37.5k in AnTuTu, no?

  Am I missing something? 34.6k is not 30% larger than 37.5k. It just isn't!

  They're just being misleading. The picture is only showing the results from one part of the Antutu benchmark where the iPhone X wins. The iPhone X loses for every other section (presumably), hence the 30% lead for the OnePlus 6 in the final result.
• I love the size of the notch on the One Plus 6. I would love for Apple to be able to shrink their Face ID and other components so that more of the Status Bar can display usable data with the next iPhone launch.
• Is there a benchmark for measuring how fast the OnePlus ships your personal data to China vs. iPhone?
• The one thing that never gets discussed is the companies behind these products.
  Where do you go for support? The company or the carrier?
  How does a Android phone manufacturer support the OS or does it?
  Who repairs the device if it gets broken?
  What kind of turn around time is a repair and how long is the warranty on the repair?
  How long is the warranty and what about coverage for accidental or liquid damage?
  If you have to go thru your carrier for support then no way is it worth it, even if it was a free phone.
  I wouldn't want to pay a deductible to get a rebuilt device with 3rd party parts that might fail prematurely and then I have to pay another deductible to get it replaced again.
  With all of the efforts on the right to repair your own device being advertised, no one talks about how, in general, you never see a manufacturer authorized repair place for Android phones. You either take it to a quickie repair place or send it somewhere and wait for it to be fixed or worse, pay the carrier to give you someone else's broken device that was refurbished.
  Some might argue that Apple does that when they replace your phone. Not true. Apple gives you a rebuilt device (by Apple) or a new device.
  Apple doesn't care since both are from them and they are the manufacturer, so no 3rd party parts. A refurbished device from your carrier comes from a 3rd party that takes broken or liquid damaged devices and rebuilds them with non OEM parts.
  
• Thanks for not doing one of those stupid App races (that everyone on YouTube always does). The most useless test ever conceived, no doubt to give Android phones somewhere to claim victory.

• Moving onto the AnTuTu benchmark, the OnePlus manages to beat out the iPhone X by almost 30%.
  

  Eh.What? OnePlus has 34.6k, while iPhoneX has 37.5k in AnTuTu, no?

  Am I missing something? 34.6k is not 30% larger than 37.5k. It just isn't!

  Moving onto the AnTuTu benchmark, the OnePlus manages to beat out the iPhone X by almost 30%.
  

  Eh.What? OnePlus has 34.6k, while iPhoneX has 37.5k in AnTuTu, no?

  Am I missing something? 34.6k is not 30% larger than 37.5k. It just isn't!

  They're just being misleading. The picture is only showing the results from one part of the Antutu benchmark where the iPhone X wins. The iPhone X loses for every other section (presumably), hence the 30% lead for the OnePlus 6 in the final result.

  
  Yah, I was wondering the same thing.. some clarification or correction needed.

• Thanks for not doing one of those stupid App races (that everyone on YouTube always does). The most useless test ever conceived, no doubt to give Android phones somewhere to claim victory.

  I’m not sure why you believe those tests are useless. It’s nice to see how responsive a phone is in comparison to other phones.
• At the first sentence I wondered if this testing was originally done with the base OnePlus model and upon discovering that model didn’t turn out well in comparison to the base iPhone X model the upgraded model was used and written about. Apple Insider, please confirm or deny my curiosity. If confirmed, please explain why you chose to portray the OnePlus in a better light and iPhone in a less flattering light.
  Edit: At the first sentence of the second paragraph, I wondered.. 😉
  

  edited May 2018
• Instead of Benchmark, what about a video conversion or something that will use the CPU enough to see if there is CPU Throttling.

• Thanks for not doing one of those stupid App races (that everyone on YouTube always does). The most useless test ever conceived, no doubt to give Android phones somewhere to claim victory.

  I’m not sure why you believe those tests are useless. It’s nice to see how responsive a phone is in comparison to other phones.

  
  They don’t simulate anything approaching real-life usage.
  - Nobody launches an App and then immediately exits/switches to another App as soon as the main screen comes up. The normal use is to actually do something within the App.
  - Nobody launches multiple CPU/RAM/GPU intensive games and randomly switches between them. People normally play a single game for some time.
  - Nobody switches constantly between 20 Apps. (there have been studies on this). Most people have around 10 Apps they use multiple times per day (email, messaging, browser and social Apps) and perhaps another 20 they use a few times a week.
  - Nobody switches numerous Apps continuously. Typically people do something on their phone, then it goes to sleep until something comes up (you get a text or call, or need to make one yourself). This is why mobile OSes are always quick to suspend Apps not doing anything and are also quick to turn off the screen and sleep when not being used.
  They are so far away from real-life usage scenarios it’s actually pathetic people make these videos in the first place.

• You know what? Only techie bullshit artists care about benchmarks.

  Maybe a more accurate way to say that is ‘Only tech-minded people care about benchmarks’. It’s naive to dismiss benchmarks and is it also naive to dismiss ‘real life’ app-switching tests. Both are synthetic and stretch the limits and therefore do not usually reflect actual real usage scenarios, but they are interesting if not always useful. The only useful tests are ones that show actual time savings for an average user—for instance, being able to switch through 20 apps faster than other phones is nearly useless, but being able to export a video in half the time does translate to real time savings.

  Normal people don’t switch between 20 apps and wouldn’t care about the few milliseconds difference anyway. My original position remains.